Dismissed¶¶16

Union of India v. Viney Mohindroo

Delhi HC5 Aug 2025EFA(COMM)/18/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Union of India (appellant) v. Viney Mohindroo (respondent); EFA(COMM) 18/2024 & CM APPL. 72795/2024, High Court of Delhi; jurisdiction objection raised in Execution proceedings after decree holder withdrew amount; proceedings under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act previously dismissed and issue open at that stage; bar under Order II Rule 2 CPC on questioning claim at later stage; no interference made out; appeal dismissed 05.08.2025; bench: Justices Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and Anish Dayal; counsel: Om Prakash SPC et al. for UOI; Arvind Kr. Sharma Sr. Adv. et al. for respondent.

What did the court decide?

None; pending applications, if any, rendered infructuous. ¶¶16

Union of India Vs Viney Mohindroo — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~38

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- EFA(COMM) 18/2024 & CM APPL. 72795/2024

¶4

UNION OF INDIA .....APPELLANT

¶5

Through: Mr. Om Prakash, SPC with Mr. Nitish Pande, Ms. Swati Mishra, Mr. Amish Kumar, Mr. Manuj Gautam, Ms. Sanhita Pandey and Mr. Sarthak Udaipuria, Advs. for UOI.

¶6

versus

¶7

VINEY MOHINDROO .....RESPONDENT Through: Mr. Arvind Kr. Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aniteja Sharma and Mr. Dashmesh Tripathy, Advs.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

¶10

O R D E R % 05.08.2025

¶11

Proceedings were instituted under Section 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, by the Appellant and the same were dismissed.

¶12

In the Execution proceedings, the amount was already withdrawn by decree holder and an objection was raised about jurisdiction by the Appellant. 3. The said issue was open to be contested by the Appellant at the stage of Sections 34 and 37 proceedings.

¶13

If we consider the claim of the petitioner in the backdrop of provisions of Order II Rule 2 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘ CPC ’), in our opinion it is not open for the appellant to question the same at this stage of the proceedings.

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/08/2025 at 12:39:16

¶16

That being so, in our opinion, no case for causing interference is made out. Present appeal stands dismissed.

¶17

Pending applications, if any, are rendered infructuous.

¶18

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶19

NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J

¶20

ANISH DAYAL, J

¶21

AUGUST 5, 2025/MK/ sp

¶22

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/08/2025 at 12:39:16

Union of India v. Viney Mohindroo

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Union of India v. Viney Mohindroo

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narender Rana & Ors. Vs State & Ors.

Kapil and Ors. Vs Union of India and Anr.

Col M P Wadwa and Ors. Vs the Registrar Co-Operative Societies and Ors.

Ankit Chaurasia Vs New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.

Devendra Kumar Vs New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.

Sunita & Ors. Vs Town Vending Committee (Ndmc) and Anr.