Dismissed
Ikramuddin v. Rahisuddin
Delhi HCCS(OS)/847/2011
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for non-prosecution and in default due to the non-appearance of the Plaintiff in court multiple times.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~15
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CS(OS) 847/2011 & I.A. 5554/2011 IKRAMUDDIN .....Plaintiff
¶4
- Through: None.
¶5
versus
¶6
RAHISUDDIN .....Defendant
¶7
Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
¶8
- O R D E R
¶9
- % 15.09.2025
¶10
- None for the parties.
¶11
- Order sheets indicate that there has been no appearance on behalf of the Plaintiff since 09.01.2025. On 09.01.2025, the matter was called twice as indicated from the order and there was no appearance on behalf of the parties. In the interest of justice, adverse orders were deferred.
¶12
- Even today, there is no appearance on behalf of the parties. It appears that the Plaintiff is not interested in prosecuting the suit.
Coram
AI extract
Jyoti Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court