Suit dismissed for default after the plaintiff's counsel's vakalatnama was discharged and no one appeared for the plaintiff despite the matter being called out twice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~O-20
INTERNATIONAL MEDIA CORPORATION & ORS
.....Defendant
Through: Mr.Ankit Rastogi, Mr.Udit Tewari and Mr.Nikhil Bharti, Advocates for D-2. Mr.Deepak Gogia, Mr.Aadhar Nautiyal and Ms.Shivangi Kohli, Advocates for D-4. Mr.Abhishek K. Singh, Advocate for D-5.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R % 10.09.2025
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
SEPTEMBER 10, 2025 Nc/sph
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/09/2025 at 12:32:27
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit should be dismissed under Order IX Rule 8 CPC for plaintiff's non-appearance.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd
International Media Corporation & Ors
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
