Dismissed¶20

M/S Vishwakarma Projects(India) Pvt. Ltd. v. National Building Construction Corporation Limited & Ors.

Delhi HC9 Sept 2025CS(OS)/2160/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court; CS(OS) 2160/2011; Vishwakarma Projects (India) Pvt Ltd vs National Building Construction Corporation Ltd & Ors; Justice Jyoti Singh; 09.09.2025; suit dismissed for non-prosecution and in default; failure to substitute AR of PW1; order dated 13.08.2024; non-appearance on 29.10.2024, 17.01.2025, 18.03.2025, 24.07.2025; plaintiff absent; Joint Registrar listing.

What did the court decide?

The Court found that Plaintiff is no longer interested in prosecuting the suit. ¶19

M/S Vishwakarma Projects(India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs National Building Construction Corporation Limited & Ors. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~18

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(OS) 2160/2011

¶4

M/S VISHWAKARMA PROJECTS(INDIA) PVT LTD .....Plaintiff Through: None.

¶5

versus

¶6

NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS .....Defendants

¶7

Through: Mr. Ravi Krishan Chandna, Ms. Vidushi Chandna and Mr. Udhav K Garg, Advocates for D1&2.

¶8

Mr. Daleep Dhyani, Mr. Pradeep Mishra and Ms. Lakshita Sharma, Advocates for D3.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

% 09.09.2025

¶13

On 04.04.2024, adjournment was sought on behalf of Plaintiff for filing an application within two weeks for substituting the Authorized Representative (AR) of PW1. Order sheets indicate that no steps were taken thereafter by the learned counsel for the Plaintiff. In fact, on 29.10.2024, there was no appearance on behalf of Plaintiff. The same position continued on 17.01.2025, 18.03.2025 and 24.07.2025.

¶14

On 24.07.2025, learned Joint Registrar noted that no application for substitution of AR of Plaintiff had been filed in terms of the order dated 13.08.2024 and no one has been appearing on behalf of Plaintiff and thus, the matter was listed before the Court for further directions. Even today, there is no presence on behalf of Plaintiff. No steps have been taken in terms

¶15

CS(OS) 2160/2011

¶16

Page 1 of 2

¶17

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/09/2025 at 12:32:46

¶18

of the previous order for substitution of AR of Plaintiff.

¶19