Suit dismissed for want of appearance by the plaintiff under Order IX Rule 8 CPC, as the suit was struck off the roster due to continued non-appearance.
Suit dismissed for non-appearance of plaintiff.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~O-33
Through: None. versus SH. GOPICHAND & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Akash Vajpai and Mr. Ayush Jain, Advs. for D-12. Mr. Siddharth Shankar, Adv. for D- 17. Mr. D. S. Dagar, Adv. for D-29.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R % 03.03.2025
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
MARCH 3, 2025/P/SPH
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2025 at 14:35:59
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
