The single judge observed that the plaintiff was unrepresented and no one appeared on various dates. The suit under CS(OS) 1763/2014 was dismissed under Order IX Rule 8 of the CPC for default.
Suit dismissed under Order IX Rule 8 of CPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~O-26
SANJAY YADAV JAILDER @ SANJAY .....Plaintiff
Through: None.
versus
AMIT YADAV & ANR .....Defendants
Through: Mr. Ashok Kaushik, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R % 19.03.2025
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
MARCH 19, 2025 Nc/@m
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/03/2025 at 17:44:39
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dismiss the civil suit under Order IX Rule 8 of CPC due to lack of appearance.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
