Suit disposed of by recording a settlement reached through court-annexed mediation under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC; defendant paid Rs.12,50,000 to each plaintiff and the suit was decreed in terms of the Settlement Agreement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~61
SMT RUBY THUKRAL & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Advocate along with plaintiffs in-person.
versus
SH AJAY ARORA .....Defendant
Through: Mr. Anshul Sehgal, Advocate for D- 1. Mr. Divyanshu Jain, Advocate for proposed defendants no.2 and 3. Mr. Pranshu Paul, Advocate for proposed defendants no.4 and 5 Defendants in-person.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
%
O R D E R 10.12.2025
I.A. 30657/2025 (u/O-XXIII R-3 CPC)
Page 1 of 2
CS(OS) 113/2022
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/12/2025 at 11:48:19
CS(OS) 113/2022
AMIT BANSAL, J
DECEMBER 10, 2025
Rzu
CS(OS) 113/2022
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/12/2025 at 11:48:19
3 provisions across 2 enactments
SH AJAY ARORA
AMIT BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
