Suit for permanent injunction over the ZARI trademark and copyright was settled through mediation; the court found the settlement lawful, decreed the suit in its terms, directed refund of full court fees to the plaintiff, and disposed of pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~34
Through: Ms. Sruthi Vasugopal, Advocate (M9818558690)
versus
MS. SURBHI MUNJAL .....Defendant Through: Mr. J. K. Sharma, Advocate CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R % 18.02.2025
‘ZARI’/
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 11:10:47
the plaintiff vide order dated 01st February, 2024. Subsequently, the parties were referred for mediation vide order dated 02nd August, 2024, wherein, the parties have successfully negotiated a settlement and have signed the Settlement Agreement dated 23rd December, 2024.
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
FEBRUARY 18, 2025 da
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 11:10:47
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit should be decreed in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 23rd December, 2024 arrived at in mediation.
M/S ZARI SILK (INDIA) PVT. LTD.
MS. SURBHI MUNJAL
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
