Dismissal in default for non-prosecution. Despite court notice duly served after prior counsel's discharge, the appellant did not appear on successive dates; the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution. The order decides no substantive issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
HALDIRAM AND SONS BHUJIAWALA .....Appellant
Through: None.
versus
HALDIRAM INDIA PVT LTD. & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Mr. Kashish Vij, Mr. Angaddeep Singh and Ms. Arpita Mishra, Advocates Mob: 9810376869
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R % 17.02.2025
follows:
2. In view of the submissions made before this Court, issue court notice to the appellant, for appearance on the next date of hearing, through some other counsel or by itself.
3. Re-notify on 28th November, 2024.”
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/02/2025 at 12:04:02
2. None appears for the appellant, despite notice.
3. Accordingly, re-notify on 17th February, 2025.
4. This Court shall pass appropriate orders, if there is no appearance on behalf of the appellant, on the next date of hearing.”
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
FEBRUARY 17, 2025 ak
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/02/2025 at 12:04:02
Haldiram and Sons Bhujjawala
Haldiram India Pvt Ltd.
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
