Commercial suit settled through Delhi High Court Mediation Centre. Court found nothing unlawful in the settlement agreement, decreed the suit in its terms, noted payment of Rs.1,00,000 and defendants' undertaking to withdraw a trademark application, and directed refund of court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
SHIVAM TRADERS .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ashutosh Upadhyaya, Advocate.
versus
THANGALS JEWELLERY PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Sarthak Rana, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 06.03.2025
Page 1 of 2
CS(COMM) 340/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/03/2025 at 12:22:49
The Settlement Agreement shall form part of the decree.
AMIT BANSAL, J
MARCH 6, 2025
Vivek/-
Page 2 of 2
CS(COMM) 340/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/03/2025 at 12:22:49
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Shivam Traders
Thangals Jewellery Private Limited & Ors.
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
