Revocation petition against patent IN 231479. Petitioner noted the patent expired during pendency; respondent no.1 stated it neither filed nor intended to file suit on the patent. Petitioner sought withdrawal and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
versus
TROIKAA PHARMACEUTICALS LTD AND ANR......Respondents Through: Mr. Aseem Chaturvedi, Mr. Shivank Diddi and Mr. Arsh Alok, Advocates for R-1
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 04.03.2025
AMIT BANSAL, J
MARCH 4, 2025/ds
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2025 at 14:31:37
Alpa Laboratories Limited
Troikaa Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
