Dismissed
Ashok Kumar v. Ruchi Jain
Delhi HCCRL.REV.P.(NI)/179/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Four criminal revision petitions under the Negotiable Instruments Act were dismissed in default and for non-prosecution after the petitioner repeatedly failed to appear.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~76 to 79
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CRL.REV.P.(NI) 178/2025, CRL.M.A. 24535/2025, CRL.M.A. 24536/2025, CRL.M.A. 24537/2025 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 1758/2025 ASHOK KUMAR .....Petitioner
¶4
Through:
¶5
versus
¶6
SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN & ANR. .....Respondents Through:
¶7
- CRL.REV.P.(NI) 179/2025, CRL.M.A. 24538/2025, CRL.M.A. 24539/2025, CRL.M.A. 24540/2025 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 1759/2025 ASHOK KUMAR .....Petitioner
¶8
Through:
¶9
versus
¶10
- RUCHI JAIN .....Respondent Through:
¶11
- CRL.REV.P.(NI) 180/2025, CRL.M.A. 24541/2025, CRL.M.A. 24542/2025, CRL.M.A. 24543/2025 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 1760/2025 ASHOK KUMAR .....Petitioner
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Ashok Kumar
- respondent
Sushil Kumar Jain
- respondent
Ruchi Jain
- respondent
Swati Jain
- respondent
Madhubala Jain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court