Dismissed
Saheed v. State through SHO Uttam Nagar
Delhi HCBAIL APPLN./2548/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
Through:
versus
STATE THROUGH SHO UTTAM NAGAR .....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for State with Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Adv. Mr. Hemant Singh, Ms.Urvashi Jain and Mr. Aman Bidhuri, Advs. for Complainant.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL
O R D E R % 18.11.2025
1. Learned APP for the State submits that the present petitioner has been convicted in the present case vide judgment dated 30.10.2025, passed by the Court of Ms. Saumya Chauhan, ASJ (FTC)-02, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
2. In view of the statement made, the present petition is rendered infructuous and is accordingly dismissed along with pending application(s), if any.
AJAY DIGPAUL, J
NOVEMBER 18, 2025/ AS
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/11/2025 at 11:17:13
SAHEED
STATE THROUGH SHO UTTAM NAGAR
AJAY DIGPAUL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court