Revision petition dismissed as withdrawn after the parties arrived at a mediation settlement; counsel for the revisionist sought liberty to institute appropriate proceedings, which was granted as unopposed.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to institute appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
SH SURAJ PRAKASH RATRA AND ORS .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. L.S. Solanki and Dr. Anu Solanki, Advocates
versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State with Inspector Manjusha, PS Sarita Vihar Mr. Pravin Sharma, Advocate for R2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
O R D E R % 17.05.2025
[ Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
MAY 17, 2025/as
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/05/2025 at 12:22:58
Sh Suraj Prakash Ratra and Ors
The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
R2 (second respondent)
Girish Kathpalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
