Criminal revision against closure of the prosecutrix's evidence for non-appearance on three dates; court granted one final opportunity to appear on the already-fixed date and conclude cross-examination, with no further opportunity to either party.
One final opportunity granted to prosecutrix to appear on 24.03.2025 and get her cross-examination recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
VICTIM .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Kapoor, Advocate
Versus
STATE OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr.Shoaib Haider, Additional Public Prosecutor for RespondentState with SI Arti Yadav Mr. Pradeep Sherawat, Advocate for the accused
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 06.03.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2025 at 12:02:07
opportunity be given to the Prosecutrix to get her cross-examination concluded.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
MARCH 06, 2025
r
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2025 at 12:02:07
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prosecutrix should be granted a final opportunity to appear and conclude her cross-examination after her evidence right was closed for non-appearance.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Victim
State of NCT Delhi
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
