Bail application withdrawn by the petitioner; court permitted withdrawal and asked the trial court to expedite trial, preferably concluding within eight months.
Petition permitted to be withdrawn; Trial Court requested to conclude trial expeditiously, preferably within eight months, considering the applicant's young age.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.....Petitioner
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO PS KALKAJI
.....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Ld. APP for State with Insp. Karmveer Singh P.S. Kalkaji.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 06.03.2025 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present Petition, however, submits that the Trial Court may be directed to expedite the trial considering that the Applicant was barely 18 years of age at the time of commission of the offence.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
MARCH 6, 2025/va
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2025 at 11:56:40
Shiva Chaudhary
State NCT of Delhi through SHO PS Kalkaji
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
