Petitioner sought withdrawal of a criminal revision petition under Section 422 BNSS challenging an ASJ order. The High Court permitted withdrawal with liberty as prayed and disposed of the petition.
Permission to withdraw the criminal revision petition granted with liberty as prayed for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
RAJEEV JAIN .....Petitioner
Through: Counsel for Petitioner (appearance not given)
versus
STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
CRL.M.A. 12812/2025 (Exemption)
CRL.REV.P. 166/2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/05/2025 at 11:34:15
liberty as prayed for.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
MAY 8, 2025/RS
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/05/2025 at 11:34:15
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajeev Jain
State Govt of NCT of Delhi
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
