Dismissed
Lalit Mittal v. S L Shukla
Delhi HCCRL.REV.P./163/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Revision petition dismissed for non-prosecution as neither party appeared and the petitioner had not effected service of the respondent.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~29
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CRL.REV.P. 163/2017 & CRL.M.A. 3526/2017
¶4
- LALIT MITTAL .....Petitioner
¶5
Through: None. versus
¶6
S L SHUKLA .....Respondent
¶7
- Through: None.
¶8
CORAM:
¶9
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
¶10
- O R D E R
¶11
- % 03.03.2025
¶12
- No one is present on behalf of the petitioner at the time when the case is called at 04:10 PM. Even steps have not been taken by the petitioner for service of the respondent.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Lalit Mittal
- respondent
S L Shukla
Coram
AI extract
Swarana Kanta Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court