Satish Kumar Gupta Vs State Thru C.B.I.

This is an appeal filed by the Appellant-SatishKumar Gupta, against the judgment dated 12^th November, 2002 and order on sentence dated 15^th November, 2002 passed by the Special Judge, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi in case bearing no. CC No. 137/01 under Sections 7 & 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter ‘the Act’).

¶11

Vide the impugned judgment, the Appellant was convicted under Section 7 and 13(2) r/w Section 13(1)(d)of the Act and was sentenced thereunder.

¶12

As per the verification report filed on behalf of the Respondent, the Appellant has already expired on 02^nd October, 2020.

¶13

Learned counsel for the Respondent-CBI has submitted that

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/08/2025 at 15:16:15

¶16

Respondent is not aware about the legal heirs (LRs) of the Appellant.

¶17

As per Section 435 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the ‘near relatives’ of the Appellant have to apply for leave to continue the appeal within 30 days of the death of the Appellant. The Section 435 of BNSS reads as follows:

¶18

“Section 435 in Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 435. Abatement of appeals.

¶19

(1)Every appeal under section 418 or section 419 shall finally abate on the death of the accused.

¶20

(2)Every other appeal under this Chapter (except an appeal from a sentence of fine) shall finally abate on the death of the appellant:

¶21

Provided that where the appeal is against a conviction and sentence of death or of imprisonment, and the appellant dies during the pendency of the appeal, any of his near relatives may, within thirty days of the death of the appellant, apply to the Appellate Court for leave to continue the appeal; and if leave is granted, the appeal shall not abate.

¶22

Explanation.-In this section, "near relative" means a parent, spouse, lineal descendant, brother or sister.”

¶23

In view of the fact that as the Appellant has expired and his near relatives have not applied for leave to continue the present appeal, as per the aforesaid Section, the appeal stands abated.

¶24

Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

¶25

RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J

¶26

AUGUST 6, 2025 v/tp

¶27

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/08/2025 at 15:16:15

Satish Kumar Gupta v. State Thru C.B.I.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satish Kumar Gupta v. State Thru C.B.I.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Zahid Vs State (Gnct) of Delhi

Devender @ Lala Vs State (Nct) of Delhi

Mahavir Prasad Rajput Vs C B I

State Vs Farukh

Krishna Vs State & Anr.

Lakhi Ram Vs State of Delhi