Petition to quash a complaint case and summoning order on grounds of concealment of a prior dismissed complaint. The court found only a notice under Section 223(1) BNSS had been issued, giving the petitioner a hearing opportunity before the trial court, and dismissed the petition as premature.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~48
PRITHIRAJ SANYAL & ANR.
.....Petitioners
Through: Mr.Yogesh Sharma, Mr. Arindam Ganguly, Advs.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP with SI Arvind Kumar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R
% 20.11.2025 CRL.M.A. 34459/2025 (exemption from filing certified copies etc.)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed-of.
CRL.M.C. 8265/2025 & CRL.M.A. 34458/2025 (stay)
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/11/2025 at 12:19:35
before the Sessions Court.
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
NOVEMBER 20, 2025
Gs/ma
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/11/2025 at 12:19:35
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a quashing petition under Section 528 BNSS is maintainable at the pre-summoning stage when only a notice under Section 223(1) BNSS has been issued.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Prithiraj Sanyal
Anr.
State NCT of Delhi
Mohd. Zahid
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
