Manoj Kumar & Ors. Vs the State NCT of Delhi and AN4R

This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 0686/2022, dated 26.12.2022, registered at P.S Ambedkar Nagar, Delhi under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties.

¶14

CRL.M.C. 7351/2025 Page 1 of 4

¶15

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Da te:1 5.10.2025 19:19:58

¶16

The factual matrix giving rise to the instant case is that the marriage between Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent no. 2/complainant was solemnized on 16.02.2010 as per Hindu Rites and ceremonies at New Delhi. Three Children were born out of the said wedlock. However, on account of temperamental differences Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2 are living separately since 25.12.2019.

¶17

As per averments made in the FIR, Respondent No. 2 was subjected to physical and mental harassment on account of dowry demands by the Petitioners. FIR No. 0686/2022 was lodged at the instance of Respondent No. 2 at PS Ambedkar Nagar under sections 498A/406/34 IPC against the Petitioners.

¶18

During the course of proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and the terms of settlement were written in the form of a Memorandum of Understanding cum Settlement Agreement dated 23.04.2025. It is submitted that Petitioner No.1 and Respondent No. 2 have obtained divorce on 06.08.2025 and the Petitioner no. 1 has paid the entire settlement amount of Rs. 22,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Two Lac only) to respondent no. 2 as per the schedule in the settlement. It is further submitted that the custody of the children shall remain with the Respondent No. 2 with no visitation rights to petitioners. Copy of the Memorandum of Understanding cum Settlement Agreement dated 23.04.2025 has been annexed as Annexure P-2.

¶19

CRL.M.C. 7351/2025 Page 2 of 4

¶20

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Da te:1 5.10.2025 19:19:58

¶21

Parties are physically present before the Court. They have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer SI Sakshi Punia, from PS Ambedkar Nagar.

¶22

Respondent No. 2 confirms that the matter has been amicably settled with the petitioners without any force, fear, coercion and she has received the entire settlement amount and has no objection if the FIR No. 0686/2022 is quashed against the Petitioners.

¶23

In view of the settlement between the parties, learned Additional PP appearing for the State, also has no objection if the present FIR No. 0686/2022 is quashed.

¶24

Hon’ble Supreme Court has recognized the need of amicable settlement of disputes in Rangappa Javoor vs The State Of Karnataka And Another , Diary No. 33313/2019, 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 74, Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs Babita Raghuvanshi & Anr., (2013) 4 SCC 58 & in Gian Singh vs State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 .

¶25

Further, it is settled that the inherent powers under section 482 of the Code are required to be exercised to secure the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of any court. Further, the High Court can quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties. Supreme Court and this Court have repeatedly held that the cases arising out of matrimonial differences should be put to a quietus

¶26

CRL.M.C. 7351/2025 Page 3 of 4

¶27

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Da te:1 5.10.2025 19:19:58

¶28

if the parties have reached an amicable settlement. Reliance may be placed upon B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, (2003) 4 SCC .

¶29

In view of the above facts that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will and without any coercion. Hence, it would be in the interest of justice, to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

¶30

In the interest of justice, the petition is allowed, and the FIR No. 0686/2022 dated 26.12.2022, registered at P.S Ambedkar Nagar, Delhi under section 498A/406/34 IPC and all the other consequential proceeding emanating therefrom is hereby quashed.

¶31

Petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

¶32

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶33

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J October 15, 2025 MA

¶34

CRL.M.C. 7351/2025 Page 4 of 4

¶35

Signature Not Verified

¶36

Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Da te:1 5.10.2025 19:19:58

Manoj Kumar & Ors. v. the State NCT of Delhi and AN4R

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj Kumar & Ors. v. the State NCT of Delhi and AN4R

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Viplav @ Ravi Vs State of NCT Delhi

Manikant Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Vikas Hospital Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Mahesh Singh and Others Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Others

Kakali Mitra Vs M/S Sarvasva Capital Finance Pvt. Ltd.

Kunal@Gopal Vs State NCT of Delhi