Petitioner sought leave to withdraw two petitions (CRL.L.Ps CC 550/2024 and 553/2024) with liberty to file afresh under correct provisions. The High Court of Delhi disposed of the petitions as withdrawn without addressing merits. Pending applications stand disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~36 & 37
Through: Mr. Saurabh Srivastava, Advocate via video-conferencing.
versus
RAJESH CHAURASIYA .....Respondent
Through:
Through: Mr. Saurabh Srivastava, Advocate via video-conferencing.
versus
SURENDER SHARMA .....Respondent Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 14.01.2025
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in these matters seeks leave to withdraw the present petitions, with liberty to file afresh under the correct provisions, as may be permissible, in accordance with law.
In view of the above, the petitions are disposed-of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for, without making any observations on the merits of the matter.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
JANUARY 14, 2025/ V.Rawat
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 14:50:08
MAYANK GUPTA
RAJESH CHAURASIYA
SURENDER SHARMA
Anup Jairam Bhambhani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
