Disposed

Ashok Kumar v. C.B.I through Its Director

Delhi HC9 Apr 2025CRL.M.C./5122/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Section 482 CrPC sought quashing of a 1997 CBI FIR alleging offences under the PC Act and IPC. Charges had been framed by the Special Judge, after which counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings; pending applications disposed of.

Ashok Kumar Vs C.B.I through Its Director — Corruption | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~17

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 5122/2023

¶4

ASHOK KUMAR .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. G.D. Mishra, Advocate (through Vc).

¶6

versus

¶7

C.B.I THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar SPP for the CBI with Mohd. Changez Ali Khan and Ms. Mishika, Advocates.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 09.04.2025

¶12

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶13

The present petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeks the following prayers:

¶14

“(a) Quash the FIR NO. RC47(A)/97DLI DATED 13.06.1997,P.S. CBI ACB NEW DELHI U/S 120-B R/W SEC. 13(l)(d) of P.C. ACT, 1988 AND SEC. 13(2) R/W SEC. 113(1)(D) OF P.C ACT 1988 & SEC. 420, 467 AND 471 OF IPC and subsequent proceedings, if any, arising out of the present FIR therefrom, in the interest of justice;

¶15

(b) Pass such other and further orders as this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in view of the facts and circumstances mentioned hereinabove.”

¶16

3. It is pointed out that charges were ordered to be framed by the learned Special Judge on 14.10.2023 and the formal charges have been framed vide order dated 31.10.2023.

¶17

In view of the above, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner

¶18

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/04/2025 at 14:07:52

¶19

seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.

¶20

Leave granted.

¶21

The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.

¶22

Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

¶23

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶24

APRIL 9, 2025/bsr/sc

¶25

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/04/2025 at 14:07:52

Ashok Kumar v. C.B.I through Its Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Kumar v. C.B.I through Its Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hari Datt Sharma Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Deepak Khattar Vs State Gnct Delhi through SHO Eow and Ors.

Subhadra Vs Anil Kumar Verma

Deepak Vs the State NCT of Delhi

Mahesh Yadav & Ors. Vs the State (N.C.T of Delhi) & Anr.

Ravi Kiran Jagatha Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.