Dismissed¶¶24

Sharad Kumar Aggarwal v. the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC19 Nov 2025CRL.M.C./5030/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court; CRL.M.C. 5029/2017; CRL.M.C. 5030/2017; CRL.M.A. 19872/2017 (stay); CRL.M.A. 19874/2017 (stay); Sharad Kumar Aggarwal; The State Govt of NCT of Delhi; Order on Charge dated 31.08.2016; learned CMM New Delhi; FIR No. 24/2009; FIR No.140/2009; CR. No. 29/2017; CR. No. 30/2017; Learned ASJ; dismissed 06.07.2017; dismissed for non-prosecution; non-prosecution; adjournments; Justice Neena Bansal Krishna; 19.11.2025

What did the court decide?

Considering the consistent adjournments being sought, the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present Petitions and the Applications; both Criminal Petitions and the stay Applications are hereby dismissed for non-prosecution. ¶¶24

Sharad Kumar Aggarwal Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~19 & 20

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

CRL.M.C. 5029/2017, CRL.M.A. 19872/2017 (stay)

¶4

SHARAD KUMAR AGGARWAL .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Counsel for Petitioner (appearance not given)

¶6

versus

¶7

THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State.

¶8

¶9

- CRL.M.C. 5030/2017, CRL.M.A. 19874/2017 (stay)

¶10

SHARAD KUMAR AGGARWAL .....Petitioner

¶11

Through: Counsel for Petitioner (appearance not given)

¶12

versus

¶13

THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State.

¶14

CORAM:

¶15

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

% 19.11.2025

¶18

Learned proxy counsel for the Petitioner submits that the local counsel is in Ajamgarh. The main counsel has died. He has been requested to seek an adjournment.

¶19

The record shows that the Criminal Petitions have been filed to challenge the Order on Charge dated 31.08.2016 framed by the learned CMM, New Delhi in FIR No. 24/2009 in CRL.M.C. 5029/2017 and FIR No.140/2009 in CRL.M.C. 5030/2017. This Order was challenged before the Learned ASJ in CR. No. 29/2017 in CRL.M.C. 5029/2017 and CR. No.

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/11/2025 at 12:17:53

¶22

30/2017 in CRL.M.C. 5030/2017 but the same also got dismissed vide Order dated 06.07.2017. After filing of these Petitions, the record shows that consistently adjournments have been taken in these matters.

¶23

Learned APP for the State, submits that aside from taking adjournments here, the Accused are also stalking the trial, before the learned Trial court.

¶24

Considering the consistent adjournments being sought, it is evident that the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present Petitions, as well as, the Applications, which are hereby dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶25

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J

¶26

NOVEMBER 19, 2025/RS

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/11/2025 at 12:17:53

Sharad Kumar Aggarwal v. the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sharad Kumar Aggarwal v. the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Sharma Vs the State (Nct of Delhi)

Chand Malik Vs the State of NCT of Delhi

Mrs Taran Ojha @ Tarang Ojha Vs Mr Arun Malhrotra and Anr.

Shalini Grag & Anr. Vs Shri Madan Mohan Proprietor of Bm Traders & Anr.

Sandeep Alias Rahul Alias Raju Vs State of Gnct of Delhi

Pawan Kumar @ Vats Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.