Petitioner sought relief in a criminal writ petition, but the State reported he had already been prematurely released after remission, rendering the petition infructuous; the court disposed of it without further adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
PAWAN SINGH .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Astha, Advocate (through VC)
versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for the State with Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocate with SI Rahul Ranjan
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
O R D E R % 03.07.2025 [ Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
JULY 3, 2025 ‘ rs’
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/07/2025 at 09:44:14
Pawan Singh
State of NCT of Delhi
Girish Kathpalia
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
