Petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition, stating that the parties had reached an amicable settlement. The court took the counsel's statement on record and dismissed the petition along with pending applications as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
JITENDRA SINGH, PROPRIETOR OF M/S. SRI RAM
ENTERPRISES .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Jaitegan Singh Khurana, Advocate.
versus
OKAYA POWER PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pranav Jain, Mr. Shrey Nautiyal, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R
% 12.11.2025
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that both parties have come to an amicable settlement, and therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the petition.
The statement made by learned counsel is taken on record and petition, along with pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn.
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
NOVEMBER 12, 2025 /vd
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/11/2025 at 11:40:52
Jitendra Singh, Proprietor of M/s. Sri Ram Enterprises
Okaya Power Private Limited
Anr.
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
