Bail application dismissed. Accused charged with non-consensual sexual acts and threatening a minor under IPC and POCSO. Court held allegations grave, trial nearing end, and DNA evidence corroborated claims.
Bail granted to the applicant is rejected; bail application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
MOHD.FARID ANSARI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Chander Pal Singh Gusain, Advocate.
versus
THE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP with SI Mahendra Patel, PS-Narela. Mr. Anindya Malhotra, Ms. Ishita Sehrawat, Advocate for complainant.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R
% 11.11.2025
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/11/2025 at 11:39:09
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/11/2025 at 11:39:09
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
NOVEMBER 11, 2025 /vd/na
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/11/2025 at 11:39:09
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the court should grant regular bail to an accused facing grave sexual offences involving a minor at the trial stage.
Whether the evidence of unnatural sex and threat to the victim precludes bail regardless of clean antecedents.
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Mohd. Farid Ansari
The Govt of NCT of Delhi
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
