Quashed

Quazi Shakiluddin Ahmad v. State the Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC22 Sept 2025CRL.M.C./439/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court allowed a petition to quash an FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and Section 528 BNS 2023. The court held that since the parties had settled their differences via an MOU and the complainant had no objection, the FIR under Sections 354, 509, 354-A, 506, and 452 IPC was quashed and the case disposed of.

What did the court decide?

The FIR No. 565/2016, subsequent proceedings, and charge sheet were quashed; the petition was allowed and disposed of.

Quazi Shakiluddin Ahmad Vs State the Govt of NCT of Delhi… — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~30

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 439/2025 QUAZI SHAKILUDDIN AHMAD

¶4

.....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Krishan Kumar, Advocate.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE THE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

¶8

.....Respondent

¶9

Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for State.

¶10

CORAM:

¶11

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R

¶12

% 22.09.2025

¶13

A Petition under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner for quashing of FIR No.565/2016 under Section 354/509/354-A/506/452 IPC registered at Police Station Govindpuri, Delhi.

¶14

The allegations made in the Complaint are that the Petitioner who was the neighbour had been troubling the Complainant by making obscene gestures. The Petitioner was also threatening to kill the husband and brother-in-law of the Complainant. His conduct had not improved, but continued to harass the Complainant. Hence, the Complainant/Respondent No.2 made a Complaint on which FIR No. 565/2016 U/s 354/509/354-A/506/452 IPC was registered against the Petitioners at Police Station Govind Puri, Delhi.

¶15

It is submitted that both the petitioners and respondent No. 2 have already sorted out their all differences with the intervention of their respective

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/09/2025 at 12:48:55

¶18

persons of the vicinity vide MOU/Settlement Deed dated 02.01.2025 and they have left no grudge or grievance against each other in any manner whatsoever. Therefore, the Petition be quashed.

¶19

The complainant is present in the Court and submits that the matter stands settled with the Petitioner and she has no objection if the FIR is quashed against the Petitioner on account of the Settlement dated 02.01.2025 already arrived at between the parties.

¶20

The parties are present before this Court in-person today, and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer concerned.

¶21

In view of the submissions made, the Petition is allowed. Accordingly, the FIR bearing No. 565/2016 registered at Police Station Govind Puri, for offences punishable under Sections 354/509/354-A/506/452 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 with all the subsequent proceedings and the charge sheet is hereby quashed qua the Petitioner.

¶22

The Petition stands disposed of.

¶23

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J

¶24

SEPTEMBER 22, 2025/va

¶25

This is a digitally signed order.

¶26

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/09/2025 at 12:48:55

Quazi Shakiluddin Ahmad v. State the Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Quazi Shakiluddin Ahmad v. State the Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anupam Jain and Others Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Naqibullah Rodaie Vs Air Customs, Igi Airport, New Delhi

Shadab Malik through Its Pairokar Mohd Javed Vs Director General of GST Intelligence & Ors.

Prem Alias Prem Singh Vs the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Sh Aruna Alias Arun Kumar Pradhan Vs Union of India and Anr.

Prateek Madhan & Ors. Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.