Dharmender Singh Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

¶1

$~47

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 428/2025

¶4

DHARMENDER SINGH .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Counsel for Petitioner (appearance not given) with Petitioner.

¶6

versus

¶7

THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for the State with SI Vijay PS Seema Puri. Mr. Nitish Kumar Singh, Mr. Shashank Kumar and Mr. Amit Kumar Thakur, Advocates. Respondent No. 2 in person.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 07.07.2025

¶12

CRL.M.A. 3905/2025 (Exemption)

¶13

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶14

The Application stands disposed of.

¶15

W.P.(CRL) 428/2025

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ( hereinafter referred to as ‘B.N.S.S. ’) ( under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ) ( hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.PC’ ), has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner for quashing of FIR No. 93/2019 dated 11.02.2019 under Section 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ( hereinafter

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/07/2025 at 11:47:52

¶19

referred to as ‘IPC ’) registered at Police Station Seemapuri, Shahdara and all the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom.

¶20

Issue Notice.

¶21

On advance Notice, learned ASC has appeared and accepts the Notice on behalf of the State.

¶22

Brief facts of the case are that on 15.02.2015, the Respondent No. 2 taken gold loan Rs.90,000/- and Rs.15,000/- in two different loan accounts from the IIFL Gold Loan. In October, 2016, the Respondent No. 2 deposited Rs.72,000/- and Rs.20,000/- in the IIFL Gold Loan in Dilshad Garden Branch. While working with Dilshand Branch of the Gold Loan Company, the Petitioner did not deposit the same in loan account of the Respondent No. 2.

¶23

On 11.02.2019, on the Complaint of the Respondent No.2, FIR No. 93/2019 dated 11.02.2019 under Section 406 and 420 IPC, got registered at Police Station Seemapuri, Shahdara. In August, 2021, the Petitioner was arrested and subsequently released on Bail. Meanwhile, the Petitioner suffered with tongue cancer and currently he is under treatment.

¶24

It is stated that the Petitioner and the Respondent No. 2 have amicably settled all the disputes and differences between them and arrived at Settlement dated 04.02.2025.. In the Settlement, it was inter alia settled between the parties that the Petitioner agreed to pay a sum of Rs.11,000/- to the Respondent, in two equal instalments. It is further settled between the parties that the first instalment of Rs.55,000/- shall be paid by the Petitioner at the time of signing of the present Petition while second instalment of Rs.55,000/- shall be paid by the Petitioner to the Respondent No. 2 at the time of hearing/quashing the case. In support thereof, the Affidavit of Jay

¶25

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/07/2025 at 11:47:52

¶26

Kishan, Respondent No. 2 dated 04.02.2025 has been annexed. In view of the Settlement, no grievance remains between the parties.

¶27

Today, the Respondent No. 2, who is present in the Court, has been identified by the Investigating Officer and states that he has received the cheated amount and has no objection if the said FIR is quashed.

¶28

The Statement of the parties have already been recorded before the learned Joint Registrar. They have entered into the Settlement voluntarily and without any fear and coercion and undertake to remain bound by the terms of the said Settlement.

¶29

Considering that the parties have settled the matter, the FIR No. 93/2019 dated 11.02.2019 under Section 406 and 420 IPC, registered at Police Station Seemapuri, Shahdara and all the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, are quashed

¶30

The Petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶31

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J

¶32

JULY 7, 2025/RS

¶33

This is a digitally signed order.

¶34

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/07/2025 at 11:47:52

Dharmender Singh v. the State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharmender Singh v. the State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd Imran Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Gaurav Bhayana & Anr. Vs the State & Anr.

Tarun Sharma and Ors. Vs the State Gnct of Delhi and Anr.

Harvinder Singh & Anr. Vs the State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Subhash Chand Aggarwal & Ors. Vs State of N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr.

Sagir Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.

Shri Rashid & Anr. Vs the State through SHO Sagarpur, New Delhi & Anr.

Jitender @ Kalla Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Anil Singh & Anr. Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Shri Vivek Vs the State Govt. of Nct.of Delhi

Pawan Yadav Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Monu Sharma Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Sh Love Yadav @ Love Kumar Yadav @Love Kumar & Ors. Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Mohd. Sajid & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.