Husband sought habeas corpus claiming his wife was detained by another man. The wife appeared before the court via video-conferencing, affirmed she had left her matrimonial home voluntarily and did not wish to return. Court found no detention and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~51
Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate.
Versus
THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Insp. Raj Kumar and SI Neeraj Kumar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
J U D G M E N T
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:2 0.12.2025 12:09:31
W.P.(CRL) 4210/2025 1
(VIVEK CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
(MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE
DECEMBER 18, 2025/ss/sa
W.P.(CRL) 4210/2025 2
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:2 0.12.2025 12:09:31
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's wife was under illegal detention by a third party, warranting habeas corpus relief.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
SATNAM SINGH
THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)
VIVEK CHAUDHARY
MANOJ JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
