Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition; counsel stated she had instructions to withdraw. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn along with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
Through: Ms. Anju Rani, Advocate.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl.) with Mr. Sangeet and Mr. Aniket Kumar Singh, Advocates for State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
SANJEEV NARULA, J
DECEMBER 17, 2025 as
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/12/2025 at 12:55:06
XYZ
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
