Petitioner sought withdrawal of the criminal miscellaneous petition after counsel stated respondent no.2 had expired. The court recorded the statement and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
RK SINGH THROUGH LR VIKAS SINGH .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sachin Sangwan, Adv.
versus
THE STATE(GOVT OF NCT DELHI) & ANR.
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R
% 06.08.2025
Mr. Sachin Sangwan, learned counsel for the petitioner states that respondent no.2 has since been expired, and therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
The statement made by learned counsel is taken on record, and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
AUGUST 6, 2025/ib
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/08/2025 at 15:20:16
RK Singh through LR Vikas Singh
The State (Govt of NCT Delhi)
Respondent No. 2
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
