Allowed

Sh Farman & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC9 May 2025W.P.(CRL)/402/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi, in an oral judgment, allowed a writ petition and quashed FIR No. 0013/2025 and consequential proceedings under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court relied on a compromise deed signed between the petitioner and respondent No. 2, noting the absence of any coercion and the consent of the State representative to quash the case.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 0013/2025 and all consequential proceedings under sections 118(1)/3(5) BNS, 2023 quashed; deposit of Rs. 5000 by each petitioner directed.

Sh Farman & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. — Cheque Dishonour | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~63

¶2

*** IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI**

¶3

% Date of decision: 09.05.2025

¶4

W.P.(CRL) 402/2025 SH. FARMAN & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. M.C. Sharma, Adv. Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Ms. Anamika Ghai Niyazi, Ms. Kirti Sethi & Mr. Arquam Alia, Advs. Petitioners in person.

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. … Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC and Mr. Alok Sharma with SI Shudhanshu, PS Kalyanpuri Mr. Harendra Singh, Adv. for R-2 along with R-2 in person.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA

¶8

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

¶9

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.

¶10

This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashing of FIR No. 0013/2025, dated 02.01.2025, registered at P.S Kalyanpuri under sections 118(1)/3(5) BNS, 2023 and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties.

¶11

W.P.(CRL) 402/2025 Page 1 of 4

¶12

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Da te:0 9.05.2025 17:26:09

¶13

On 01.01.2025, a quarrel took place between the Petitioners and the Respondent No.2 whereby the Respondent No.2 sustained minor injuries. Thereafter, Respondent No.2 lodged the aforesaid FIR No. 0013/2025 against Petitioners. The complainant Imran lodged cross FIR No. 0014/2025 under sections 118(1)/3(5) BNS, 2023 at PS Kalyanpuri against the Respondent No.2.

¶14

During the proceedings, the parties have amicably resolved their disputes with the intervention close friends and executed a Compromise/Settlement Deed dated 17.01.2025. In pursuance of the Settlement, it is submitted that the parties will cooperate and join the proceedings of quashing of the aforesaid FIR and will not file any other complaint against each other. The copy of Compromise/Settlement Deed dated 17.01.2025 has been placed on record as Annexure P-3.

¶15

The matter was placed before the Joint Registrar, who has recorded the statements of both the parties and passed the following orders:-

¶16

“01.05.2025

¶17

Today, videoconferencing is not connected due to some technical error. Complaint in this regard made to the concerned branch.

¶18

Today, statement of respondent no.2 and 10 have been recorded to ascertain the veracity and the genuineness of the parties entering into settlement.

¶19

Respondent no.2 has been identified by the counsel and IO.

¶20

W.P.(CRL) 402/2025 Page 2 of 4

¶21

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Da te:0 9.05.2025 17:26:09

¶22

Let the pre-verified statement along with this order be placed before the Hon'ble Court on 09^th May, 2025 .

¶23

Petitioners and respondent no. 2 are physically present before the Court. They have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer SI Shudhanshu, from PS Kalyanpuri.

¶24

Respondent No.2 submits that the matter has been settled with the Petitioners without any force, fear, coercion and he has no objection if the FIR No. 0013/2025 is quashed against the Petitioners.

¶25

In view of the settlement between the parties, learned Additional PP appearing for the State, also has no objection if the present FIR No. 0013/2025 is quashed.

¶26

In Gian Singh vs State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 , Hon’ble Supreme Court has recognized the need of amicable resolution of disputes by observing as under:-

¶27

"61. In other words, the High Court must consider whether it would be unfair or contrary to the interest of justice to continue with the criminal proceedings or continuation of criminal proceedings would tantamount to abuse of process of law despite settlement and compromise between the victim and the wrongdoer and whether to secure the ends of justice, it is appropriate that criminal case is put to an end and if the answer to the above question(s) is in the affirmative, the High Court shall be well within its jurisdiction to quash the criminal proceedings."

¶28

In view of the aforesaid circumstances and the fact that parties have put a quietus to the dispute, no useful purpose will be served in

¶29

W.P.(CRL) 402/2025 Page 3 of 4

¶30

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Da te:0 9.05.2025 17:26:09

¶31

continuing with the present FIR No. 0013/2025, dated 02.01.2025, registered at P.S Kalyanpuri under sections 118(1)/3(5) BNS, 2023 and all the other consequential proceeding emanating therefrom.

¶32

In the interest of justice, the petition is allowed and FIR No. 0013/2025, dated 02.01.2025, registered at P.S Kalyanpuri under sections 118(1)/3(5) BNS, 2023 and all the other consequential proceeding emanating therefrom is hereby quashed, subject to deposit of cost of Rs. 5000/- by each petitioner with the Delhi High Court Advocate Welfare Trust, within 15 days from today.

¶33

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶34

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J

¶35

MAY 09, 2025/ AK

¶36

W.P.(CRL) 402/2025 Page 4 of 4

¶37

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Da te:0 9.05.2025 17:26:09

Sh Farman & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sh Farman & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Piyush Sachdeva & Ors. Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Horam & Ors. Vs State ( NCT of Delhi)

Bhawana Verma Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Rakesh Vs State through SHO Ps Vijay Vihar & Ors.

Ahmed Adeil & Ors. Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Abhishek Kaushik Vs State N. C. T. of Delhi and Anr.

Rahul & Ors. Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Vikram Pal Vs State Gnct of Delhi & Anr.

Horam & Ors. Vs State ( NCT of Delhi)

Nadeem Vs State NCT of Delhi

Bhana Ram Choudhary Vs State NCT of Delhi

Neelu Malhotra @ Neelu Mann Vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Neelu Malhotra @ Neelu Mann Vs the Central Bureau of Investigation