Appeal against grant of two days custody parole instead of interim bail. The court modified the parole conditions to permit meetings with extended family in a closed room, witnessing the niece's marriage consent ceremony, and a same-day escorted home visit, and disposed of the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~44
SHAHID NASIR .....Appellant
Through: Mr. Shadan Farasat, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shaikh Saipan, Mr. Aman Naqvi and Mr. Shereef K. A., Advocates.
versus
NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, SPP for NIA with Mr. Vikas Wala, ASPP for NIA, Mr. Jatin, ASSP, Mr. Amit Rohila, Advocate and DSP Mr. T.V. Rajesh, CIO, NIA.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
O R D E R % 02.04.2025 CRL.M.A. 9651/2025 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.A. 397/2025
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 02:32:00
No.4 of the Judgment dated 20.03.2025.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J
APRIL 02, 2025 S. Zakir
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 02:32:00
1 issue framed by the court
Should paragraph 4 of the 20.03.2025 judgment granting custody parole be modified to expand family access and permit witnessing the marriage ceremony?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shahid Nasir
National Investigation Agency
Subramonium Prasad
Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
