Petition under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act challenging a Family Court order; parties settled through court-annexed mediation and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MR. ANIL KOTNALA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Onkareshwar, Advocate.
versus
MRS. KUSUM KOTNALA .....Respondent
Through: Ms.Aishwarya Rao, Mr. Sumit Jain, Ms. Venika Nim and Ms.Mansi Rao, Advocates for the Respondent.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R
% 22.09.2025 1. The present petition under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, assails the order dated 07th February, 2019, passed by Principal Judge, Family Courts, South East District, Saket, New Delhi, in M-234/13 titled Smt. Kusum Kotnala v. Anil Kotnala.
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/09/2025 at 12:05:07
SANJEEV NARULA, J
SEPTEMBER 22, 202/MK
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/09/2025 at 12:05:07
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anil Kotnala
Kusum Kotnala
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
