Dismissed

Shyam Sunder Aggarwal v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi HC9 Jan 2025W.P.(CRL)/3764/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought an enquiry via writ petition regarding illegal public land encroachment. Respondents undertook to remove the construction. Petitioner expressed satisfaction, prayers for further reliefs were declined, and petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Reliefs sought at prayer clauses a, b and c are declined; petition disposed of after recording Respondents' undertaking.

Shyam Sunder Aggarwal Vs Union of India & Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~18

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(CRL) 3764/2024 & CRL.M.A. 36133/2024 SHYAM SUNDER AGGARWAL .....Petitioner

¶4

Through: Mr. Puneet Goel, Advocate

¶5

versus

¶6

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manu Chaturvedi, Standing Counsel for MCD. Mr. Abhigyan Siddhant, Govt. Pleader for R-1/UOI Mr. Khwaja Umair, Advocate for R-3 and R-4 with Mr. Pushpendra Kumar, E.E. Shahadra South.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA O R D E R

¶8

% 09.01.2025

¶9

The present petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to Respondent nos. 1 and 3 to conduct an enquiry on the complaint of the Petitioner dated 16.07.2024.

¶10

Learned counsel for the Respondent nos. 3 and 4 relies upon the order dated 13.11.2024 passed by the co-ordinate bench in W.P.(C)15804/2024 which was filed by the same Petitioner.

¶11

2.1 He states that filing of the present petition is only a duplication of the reliefs sought in W.P.(C)15804/2024.

¶12

2.2 He states that in any event the Petitioner is aggrieved due to the illegal construction carried out by the owner/occupier of property no. 9/59 Geeta

¶13

W.P.(CRL) 3764/2024 Page 1 of 2

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 12:53:20

¶15

Colony, Delhi which has resulted in encroachment of a public land.

¶16

2.3 He states that Respondent nos. 3 and 4 have already initiated appropriate proceedings and sealed the illegal construction on 14.11.2024; and on instructions from Mr. Pushpendra Kumar, E.E. Shahadra South, he states that the illegal construction which is in the form of public land encroachment will be removed in its entirety within a period of one (1) month.

¶17

2.4 He however states that the allegations against Respondent no. 4 in the complaint dated 16.07.2024 are neither justified nor made out.

¶18

Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that in view of the aforesaid statement made by Respondent nos. 3 and 4 that the illegal public land encroachment shall stand removed, he is satisfied and he does not press for any other reliefs.

¶19

Respondent nos. 3 and 4 are bound down to the aforesaid statement recorded at paragraph 2.3, made before this Court today.

¶20

This Court does not deem it appropriate to grant reliefs sought at prayer clauses a, b and c as sought for in this petition and the said reliefs are accordingly declined.

¶21

The petition is disposed of in terms thereof.

¶22

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J

¶23

JANUARY 9, 2025/ mt/sk

¶24

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶25

W.P.(CRL) 3764/2024 Page 2 of 2

¶26

Shyam Sunder Aggarwal v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shyam Sunder Aggarwal v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arun Ramchandran Pillai Vs Directorate of Enforcement

Nita Puri Vs Serious Fraud Investigation Offioce Sfio

Shiv Kumar Yadav Vs the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Jugal & Ors. Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Puran Singh Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Azhar Khan Vs State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Dharmender Kumar Tandon Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Archit Ashwani Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Nita Puri Vs Serious Fraud Investigation Offioce Sfio

Shiv Kumar Yadav Vs the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Jugal & Ors. Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Abhay Sapru & Anr. Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Megha Nagar & Anr. Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Thoppani Sanjeev Rao Vs Shri Priyank Kanoong Chairperson National Commission for Protection of Child Rights and Ors.