Writ petition for parole disposed with direction to Jail Superintendent to decide application within two weeks; no opinion on merits expressed.
Direction to treat petition as parole application and decide within two weeks. ¶¶17
The present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Respondent to treat this petition as an application for parole and place the same before the Jail Superintendent, who is directed to decide the same within a period of two (2) weeks in accordance with law. ¶¶17
$~14
SHIV KUMAR YADAV .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Advocate
versus
THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC (Crl.) with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar and Mr. Anurag Arora, Advocates ASI Om Prakash, P.S. Sarai Rohilla
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
W.P.(CRL) 2003/2024 Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 12:53:02
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
JANUARY 8, 2025/ msh/ sk
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
W.P.(CRL) 2003/2024 Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 12:53:02
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for parole under Article 226 read with Section 482 CrPC is maintainable when the petitioner has an efficacious remedy of approaching the Jail Superintendent.¶¶11
3 provisions across 3 enactments
How this case reached the court
FIR No. 1291/2014 under Sections 376(2)(m)/323/366/506 IPC registered at PS Sarai Rohilla¶¶11
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
