Petitioner sought withdrawal of a criminal writ petition with liberty to pursue remedies later. The High Court granted liberty and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
TEJ SINGH .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajneesh Bhaskar, Advocate (DHCLSC) and Mr. Rachit Raushan, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC (CRL) for State along with Ms. Priya Rai, Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Mr. Amit Rohila, Mr. Aniket Kumar Singh, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 07.01.2025
ANISH DAYAL, J
JANUARY 7, 2025/ ak
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 15:18:35
TEJ SINGH
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
ANISH DAYAL
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
