The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL concerning legislation. With counsel's submission accepted and liberty granted to seek intervention in a related matter, the petition was disposed of without substantive adjudication on the merits.
Petition dismissed; liberty granted to seek intervention in W.P.(Crl.) 3274/2025.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~118
SHUBHI SRIVASTAVA ADVOCATE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Srivastava, Mr. Yogendra Kumar and Ms. Shubhi Srivastava, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, ASG and Mr. Amit Tiwari, CGSC with Mr. Amit Gupta, Ms. Ayushi Srivastava, GP, Mr. Shubham Sharma, Mr. Vikram Aditya Singh, Mr. Ayush Tanwar, Mr. Arpan Narwal, Mr. Naman Singh, Mr. Yashwardhan Sharma, Mr. Kushagra Malik, Advocate for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R % 15.10.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2025 at 12:20:56
as withdrawn with the liberty to the petitioner to seek their intervention in W.P.(Crl.) 3274/2025. The petition stands disposed of.
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
OCTOBER 15, 2025 Sumit
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2025 at 12:20:56
Shubhi Srivastava
Union of India
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
