Petition sought verification of whether a Look Out Circular existed against the petitioner's husband. The Union of India stated no LOC was in existence as on date; the statement was taken on record and the petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~80
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MAMTA DHAMIJA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Pratap Singh, Mr. Rajbir Singh Bal, Ms. Sanstuti Mishra and Mr. Shivam Kumar, Advocates alongwith petitioner in person. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Tiwari, CGSC with Ms. Ayushi Srivastava, Mr. Ayush Tanwar, Mr. Arpan Narmal & Mr. Kuchagra Malik, Advs for R/ UOI. Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for State with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar and Ms. Amisha Gupta, Adv. with SI Rajesh Kumar, PS Mukherjee Nagar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN
O R D E R % 17.11.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/11/2025 at 12:21:25
respondent No.1.
VIKAS MAHAJAN, J
NOVEMBER 17, 2025 sk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/11/2025 at 12:21:25
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Look Out Circular exists against the petitioner's husband, Parmod Kumar Dhamija.
Mamta Dhamija
Union of India
Anr.
Vikas Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
