Allowed

Bahadur Singh @ Rinku & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC23 Sept 2025CRL.M.C./3163/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition to quash FIR for offences under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute, based on a settlement between the parties and a divorce decree by mutual consent. Court verified the complainant's voluntary consent and receipt of settled amount, then quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings qua the petitioners.

What the court decided

AI extract

Bahadur Singh @ Rinku & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~80

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 3163/2025 & CRL.M.A. 13905/2025

¶4

BAHADUR SINGH @ RINKU & ORS. .....Petitioners

¶5

Through: Mr. Y K Singh and Mr. Pranay Nath Jha, Advs. along with the petitioners in person

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for State with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Adv. with SI Inderjeet, PS Jaitpur Mr. Mandeep Kumar Sharma, Adv. R-2 along with respondent no. 2 in person

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL

¶10

% 23.09.2025

¶11

CRL.M.A. 13904/2025

¶12

1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

¶13

2. The application stands disposed of.

¶14

CRL.M.C. 3163/2025

¶15

3. The instant petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter “BNSS”) [earlier Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter “CrPC”)] has been filed on behalf of the petitioners praying for the quashing of FIR no. 0376/2017 registered at Police Station – Jaitpur, New Delhi for offences punishable

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/10/2025 at 12:13:58

¶18

under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter “IPC”).

¶19

4. The brief facts concerning the present dispute are that the marriage between petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 was solemnized on 18.11.2011, according to Hindu rites and ceremonies. However, due to some temperamental differences between them, shortly after their marriage, they started living separately.

¶20

5. Despite efforts of reconciliation, both the parties could not settle their differences, pursuant to which respondent no. 2 got FIR no. 0376/2017 registered.

¶21

6. However, at this stage, with the intervention of family members and relatives, both the parties have entered a settlement on 20.02.2024. The terms and conditions of the said settlement are mentioned in the Settlement Agreement dated 20.02.2024 which is annexed as “Annexure P/3” to the petition. In pursuance of the said settlement, the parties have jointly agreed that they shall move for divorce under Section 13B (1) and under Section 13B (2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter “HMA”) and accordingly, a divorce decree dated 16.07.2024 was passed by the Court concerned. A copy of the divorce decree is handed over to this Court and taken on record.

¶22

7. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that respondent no. 2 has settled all her claims in respect of her dowry articles, stridhan , marriage expenses, jewelleries, gift items and claims of past, present and future maintenance and permanent alimony with the petitioners and all disputes of any nature whatsoever for a sum of ₹ 10,50,000/- out of which a remaining amount of ₹ 3,00,000/- was agreed to be paid at the time

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/10/2025 at 12:13:58

¶25

of quashing of the FIR. It is submitted that the remaining amount of ₹ 3,00,000/- has already been paid to respondent no. 2 by petitioner no. 1, and the same stands confirmed by respondent no. 2.

¶26

8. It is, thus, prayed that the instant FIR be quashed on the basis of Settlement Agreement dated 20.02.2024. 9. Learned APP for the State, who appears on advance notice, accepts notice and submits that there is no opposition to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioners seeking quashing of the FIR in question in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties. 10. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 11. The petitioners are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsel and the Investigating Officer, Police Station Jaitpur, New Delhi. Respondent no. 2 is also present in the Court and has been identified by her counsel and the concerned Investigating Officer. 12. The instant criminal proceedings concern non-compoundable offences that are private in nature and do not have a serious impact on society, especially considering that there is a settlement/compromise between the victim and the accused.

¶27

13. In such cases, it is settled law that High Court is also required to consider the conduct and antecedents of the accused in order to ascertain that the settlement has been entered into by her own free will and has not been imposed upon her by the petitioners or any person related to them. 14. In the case of State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and Ors. , (2019) 5 SCC 688 , the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the powers conferred under Section 482 of the CrPC/Section 528 of the BNSS, can be exercised by the Courts to quash criminal proceedings featuring non-

¶28

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/10/2025 at 12:13:58

¶30

compoundable offences, when the matter arises out of matrimonial or family disputes. Moreover, it is pertinent to satisfy the Court that the said noncompoundable offences are private in nature and do not have a serious impact on society.

¶31

15. Furthermore, it was observed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Ramgopal and Ors. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh , 2021 INSC 568 , that the extraordinary power enjoined upon the High Courts under Section 482 of the CrPC/Section 528 of the BNSS can be invoked even when such a case falls within the ambit of non-compoundable offences, given that the Court is satisfied that the nature of the offence does not impact the conscience of society, and that the compromise between the parties is voluntary and amicable.

¶32

16. In the present case, the complainant/respondent no. 2 is present in Court and has categorically stated that she has entered into compromise and settled the entirety of disputes with the petitioners amicably and of her own free will, without any pressure or coercion. There is also no allegation from respondent no. 2 that the conduct and antecedents of petitioners have been bad towards her after entering into this compromise. As per the Compromise Deed, respondent no. 2 has received the entire settled amount. Further, she submits that she has no objection to the present FIR being quashed. 17. Therefore, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties and the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the present petition is allowed. Accordingly, FIR bearing no.0376/2017 registered at Police Station – Jaitpur, New Delhi for offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the IPC, and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed qua the present petitioners.

¶33

This is a digitally signed order.

¶34

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/10/2025 at 12:13:58

¶35

18. Children from the wedlock, if any, are free to assert their rights in accordance with law. 19. The petition, along-with pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

¶36

AJAY DIGPAUL, J

¶37

SEPTEMBER 23, 2025 gs/av

¶38

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/10/2025 at 12:13:58

Bahadur Singh @ Rinku & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Bahadur Singh @ Rinku & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Javed Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Gautam Gandhi Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Ankur Bhardwaj Vs State NCT of Delhi

Diwakar Gupta Vs State( Govt of NCT of Delhi)

Manish Mahajan & Anr. Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Raju Saini Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.