Gautam Gandhi v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

$~
* IN THEGCOURFDLAW
srvd on: e R 09 05 2 .
sn: io fcat De 95 2.0
+ /&N.1 052L P IB A 2 6/MA 13 0. CRL
UTM NDHI GA P eti onr .
roug: h T Mr. Sahil A. Garg Nrwn, a
pil Gb a K and Ms. Hney Gla o , Advs.
s ver
NCDLHI F V. E G O AS T dtspoR en.
roug: h T Mr. Raghuinder Verma, A P
for Sae with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, t
Adv.
Vivek Singh, Harsh Cug h and
M a v Mor hecmpl a i t , Advs.f o r
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICAYDGP
J U D G M E N T
1. The prsnt bail e cton has b i l ap n field on behalf of the e
d k rus o aplicnt/e gi badu e rScto483 of n
riyNg ath e B 03 2 nt, h s arik S u 1 .
Factul Mrix
2. The prsnt bail e cton aril api s e out of FIR No. 4 2 378/ 0
te 2d a94,1 .0 egisat P r io ceSlan t - Kml Mrk a t ,e Dlhi
under Sections 1B5 of the I 420/6 dia Penal Code, 1860 n 2 .
The FIR was regi rd on the ba e st i of a wri s en complaint t ate d
n t Jiad eby4 m 2.0 531

1 Hereinafter —BNSS“

Page 1 of 12

1. In the complaint, it was gd le a ha t the compl a i n was
   uce by the a d in used per c on Priy s nk Kh a trpal and e the prsnt e
   licnt, ap Gautam Gandhi to advance a sum 9, 0 - for a
   ansciproet y.T h ml d e wthakus c
   ug neMr. Aj o t h r a yKumr Sinha , /wok atB ng des ir - 1 Tower,
   fqum. t i w M r g , N h Upd Den ayl
   4. It is agd le t ha in Novmbr e 03, a 2 c d Priynk a
   trpal and GKh e utm Gandhi a psntd to the compl re t na i ha t
   they had trd itoa en n agrmt with e one Mrs. Pitr Y av d on a
   93 fo 2.0 1 r puchase o fer i al untNo. 8/R3LG 27,Lower cm
   Ground Flr, Block o - 3, 3 Bro M dwy, Sector a - 71, Gu ugam, r
   n (PopetID:1CLTW3Y2) ary H 3 . Th e yxp rsd t fo n ug
   funds and aured s t ha the complt would r na i civ not only e
   paymnt of the r e ncal but also an equal share in profits upon p r i
   sal of the said r e oety. Relying on their pr psn re aions, the t
   pl aint erdcom g3wh aus .12 9 0
   k K an P r iypl hetds f aiu mtgvs bank hro
   cio. anst r
   5. ording to the compl c A a it, it was agr n e d ha the t subject
   y wu proetld nbso with t u ois h ren wpma d , ifsol
   o r 10.2be 3,hif sduwlcear n go it hyp f
   profit. The complt was also promised ori na gnal i oety pr
   documents as security, w h ic w e r nvr han e e over. d Upon n
   paymnt and r e fcat i ver ion, the complt a i n r e iscov d ha the t
   oety had pr lredy b a e n purchased by Priy a nk Khtrpal on e
   93 , ie2.0 1 rotha p mnw gi, ds theolfu r
   2 Hereinafter —IPC“
   3 Hereinafter —subject property“
   052 N.1B A I L P Page 2 of 12