Petitioner company has gone into liquidation and its ex-management sought a direction in the pending petition; noting no successors had appeared, the court dismissed and disposed of the petition and pending applications. No substantive issue was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~44
M/S SHAMKEN SPINNERS LTD. .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Bhuvnesh Satija, Mr. Udit Sharma, Mr Aniket Khanduri Advocates for Ex Management of Petitioner.
versus
ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY INDIA LTD.
.....Respondent
Through: Mr. Amol Sharma and Mr. Ateev Mathur, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 13.08.2025
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
AUGUST 13, 2025/RS
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2025 at 12:02:48
M/S Shamken Spinners Ltd.
Asset Reconstruction Company India Ltd.
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
