Petition sought quashing of a 2018 cheque-dishonour summoning order under Section 138 NI Act via Section 528 BNSS. The petitioner claimed unawareness of proceedings after her husband's company went into insolvency. Finding no merit, the court dismissed the petition but left her free to challenge the summons legally.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~35
SUMEET JOHAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Kr. Virmani, AOR with Mr. Shubham Pandey, Ms. Surbhi Rashmi, Ms. Jayeeta Deb Sarkar and Mr. Raman Sharma, Advocates
versus
VIJAY SHANKAR GUPTA .....Respondent
Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 12.08.2025
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2025 at 11:53:47
Order in accordance with the law.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
AUGUST 12, 2025 N
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2025 at 11:53:47
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the complaint case and 2018 summoning order under Section 138 NI Act could be quashed under Section 528 BNSS.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sumeet Johar
Vijay Shankar Gupta
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
