Disposed¶17

Hidayat Ullah & Ors. v. the State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC3 Dec 2025W.P.(CRL)/1314/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court writ petition (W.P.(CRL) 1314/2025) decided 03.12.2025 by Justice Neena Bansal Krishna; quashing of FIR No. 0134/2018, P.S. R.K. Puram, Sections 323/452/506/34 IPC, pursuant to Article 226 Constitution and Section 482 CrPC 1973; parties Hidayat Ullah & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.; Mediated Settlement dated 24.08.2024; inter se fight with injuries to Kusum, Shweta and Bharti; parties settled amicably without coercion; FIR and consequential proceedings quashed; petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of FIR No. 0134/2018 registered under Sections 323/452/506/34 IPC at P.S. R.K. Puram and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom; the Petition alongwith the pending Application stands disposed of. ¶17

Hidayat Ullah & Ors. Vs the State of NCT of Delhi… — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶17

Issue for consideration

Whether FIR No. 0134/2018 registered under Sections 323/452/506/34 IPC at P.S. R.K. Puram, and all proceedings arising therefrom, should be quashed in terms of the Mediated Settlement dated 24.08.2024 between the parties.

¶8

Court's answer

Since the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the proceedings, and quashing would be in the interest of justice.

¶14

Ratio / Principle

There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

¶15

Key takeaways

Considering the totality of circumstances and the amicable settlement, FIR No. 0134/2018 registered under Sections 323/452/506/34 IPC at P.S. R.K. Puram and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.ratio¶16

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Delhi High Court (Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna), W.P.(CRL) 1314/2025, order dated 03.12.2025: Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 sought quashing of FIR No. 0134/2018 registered under Sections 323/452/506/34 IPC at P.S. R.K. Puram, which arose from an inter se fight in which injuries were sustained by three persons, namely Kusum, Shweta and Bharti. All parties, including the injured, appeared in person, were identified by their Counsel, and endorsed the Mediated Settlement dated 24.08.2024, arrived at voluntarily without any force, fear and coercion. Finding that the amicable resolution left no useful purpose in continuing the proceedings, that quashing would be in the interest of justice, and that there was no legal impediment, the Court quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom; the Petition alongwith the pending Application stands disposed of.

¶1

$~50

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(CRL) 1314/2025 HIDAYAT ULLAH & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. B C Tyagi, Advocate with Petitioner in person

¶4

versus

¶5

THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar and Ms. Amisha Gupta, Advocates for the State Complainant in person

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 03.12.2025

¶8

1. Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed by the Petitioners seeking quashing of FIR No. 0134/2018 registered under Sections 323/452/506/34 IPC at P.S. R.K. Puram and all proceedings arising therefrom in terms of the Mediated Settlement dated 24.08.2024.

¶9

2. It is submitted that there was an inter se fight took place in which some injuries were sustained by 03 persons, namely, Kusum, Shweta and Bharti. 3. All the parties including the injured are present in person in the Court and have been identified by their Counsel. 4. The parties have endorsed the amicable settlement and accepted the terms thereof voluntarily and they submit that the said Settlement has been

¶10

This is a digitally signed order.

¶11

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2025 at 13:41:12

¶12

arrived at between the parties, without any force, fear and coercion and that they shall remain bound by the terms of the settlement.

¶13

5. The parties have submitted that all the disputes have been amicably settled vide Mediated Settlement dated 24.08.2024 and thus, no fruitful purpose will be served in continuing with the FIR.

¶14

6. In view of the above facts that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. Hence, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

¶15

7. Moreover, there is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

¶16

8. Accordingly, considering the totality of circumstances and the nature of the dispute, and the fact that they have settled the matter amicably, the FIR No. 0134/2018 registered under Sections 323/452/506/34 IPC at P.S. R.K. Puram and all the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

¶17

9. The Petition alongwith pending Application, stands disposed of.

¶18

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J

¶19

DECEMBER 3, 2025 N

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2025 at 13:41:12

Hidayat Ullah & Ors. v. the State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hidayat Ullah & Ors. v. the State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamal Pathak & Ors. Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Kamla Devi Dalal & Anr. Vs Jyoti Malik

Tripti Chauhan Vs the State of NCT Delhi & Anr.

Venkateshwar Hospital and Anr. Vs State of NCT Delhi and Anr.

Ashok & Ors. Vs the State Govt of N.C.T of Delhi & Anr.

Rahul & Anr. Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Surender Singh Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Aniket Dey Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Sh. Kuldeep Singh & Anr. Vs UOI & Anr.

Kamla Devi Dalal & Anr. Vs Jyoti Malik

State Vs Rajpal & Ors.

Dinesh Kapoor & Ors. Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Omwati Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Karan Vs State of NCT of Delhi