Dismissed¶15

Purnendu Kumar @ Kundan Singh v. Central Bureau of Investigation

Delhi HC4 Apr 2025W.P.(CRL)/1089/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court, W.P.(CRL) 1089/2025, Amit Sharma J, 04.04.2025; Purnendu Kumar @ Kundan Singh v. Central Bureau of Investigation; withdrawal of Article 226 / S.528 BNSS petition challenging conviction and sentence dated 12.02.2025 (plea bargaining, ACJM-04, Rouse Avenue, CBI case RC 7(S)/2023); dismissed as withdrawn with liberty; no merits adjudicated.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal as withdrawn with leave and liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings in accordance with law challenging the impugned order. ¶15

Purnendu Kumar @ Kundan Singh Vs Central Bureau of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~72

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(CRL) 1089/2025 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 754/2025, CRL.M.A. 10351/2025 (Exemption)

¶4

PURNENDU KUMAR @ KUNDAN SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Manav, Advocate.

¶5

versus

¶6

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Sharma, SPP for CBI with Mr. Swapnil Choudhary, Mr. Ishann Bhardwaj, Mr. Sagar and Ms. Madhulika Rai Sharma, Advocates.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶9

O R D E R % 04.04.2025

¶10

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶11

The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the BNSS seeks following prayers:-

¶12

“a) pass a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction thereby quashing/setting-aside the Order of Conviction as well as Sentence Order both dated 12.02.2025 passed by the Hon’ble Court of Sh. Vaibhav Chaurasia, Plea Bargaining Judge, ACJM- 04, Rouse Avenue District Court, New Delhi in C.C. No.CBI/01/ 2024, R.C. No. 7(S)/2023/CBI/SCI/New Delhi titled as CBI Vs. Pumendu Kumar @Kundan Singh;

¶13

(b) acquit the petitioner/convict in the present case;

¶14

(c) pass any other order(s) or relief(s), which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner. It is prayed accordingly,”

¶15

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings in accordance with law challenging the impugned order.

¶16

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 01:03:11

¶17

Leave and liberty granted.

¶18

The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.

¶19

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶20

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶21

APRIL 04, 2025 /sn/pr

¶22

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶23

Purnendu Kumar @ Kundan Singh v. Central Bureau of Investigation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Purnendu Kumar @ Kundan Singh v. Central Bureau of Investigation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Dev Vs State Gnct of Delhi

Kiran Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Shikha Verma Bathla & Anr. Vs Ashish Bathla

Sh. Madan Lal Sharma Vs the State Govt. of NCT O F Delhi and Ors.

Bhupindra Sharma Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Vanshika & Anr. Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Udit Khullar Vs Union of India & Ors.

Ranjeet Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Rahul Dev Vs State Gnct of Delhi

Mahendra Singh & Ors. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Arjun & Ors. Vs the State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Dushyant and Ors. Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Rajiv Grewal Vs State of NCT Delhi

Jyoti Vs State & Anr.