A contempt petition alleging breach of an undertaking and violation of a Delhi High Court judgment became infructuous after the Supreme Court set aside the underlying judgment. The petitioner sought leave to withdraw and the High Court disposed of the petition and pending applications as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~60
Through: Ms. Seemab Ali Fatima and Mr. Mohit Jangra, Advocates.
versus
SH. SANJAY KUMAR DAHIYA .....Respondent
Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
“a) initiate proceedings for contempt against the Respondent / Contemnor and prosecute them in accordance with law for violation/ disobedience of their oral undertaking and breach of assurance given to this Hon'ble Court and subsequent violation/ disobedience of the Judgment dated 24.05.2023 passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP(C) No. 1412/2023, titled as "M/s ANE-NIPL JV Vs GNCTD & ANR." and/or
b) Pass any other/ further order which this Hon'ble Court may deem just fit and proper, in the facts and circumstances of the case, in favour of the Petitioner.”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/11/2025 at 11:35:52
AMIT SHARMA, J
NOVEMBER 21, 2025/bsr
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/11/2025 at 11:35:52
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s ANE-NIPL JV
Sh. Sanjay Kumar Dahiya
Amit Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
