Disposed¶31

Kusum Devi v. Sh. Naresh Kumar

Delhi HC6 Oct 2025CONT.CAS(C)/873/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Kusum Devi v Sh. Naresh Kumar, CONT.CAS(C) 873/2024, Delhi High Court, Amit Sharma J, order dated 06.10.2025: contempt petition (Ss. 11 & 12, Contempt of Courts Act 1971) over non-compliance with gratuity-payment directions in W.P.(C) 10545/2023; gratuity awarded by Controlling Authority 04.04.2022 under Payment of Gratuity Act 1972; recovery from M/s Bonne Care Pvt. Ltd. via six post-dated cheques; Rs. 3,30,919/- demand, Rs. 4,95,920/- with 10% interest recovered; SDM Model Town status report; petition disposed.

What did the court decide?

Since the gratuity amount had already been deposited by M/s Bonne Care Pvt. Ltd., the present contempt petition stands disposed of. ¶31

Kusum Devi Vs Sh. Naresh Kumar — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~68

¶2

IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 873/2024

¶4

KUSUM DEVI .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Kumar Utkarsh, Adv. versus SH. NARESH KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Ms. Avni Singh with Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Adv. alongwith Vinod Kumar, Jail II.

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

% 06.10.2025 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶10

The present petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 seeks the following prayers:-

¶11

“It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to initiate contempt of court proceedings against the respondent/contemnor for deliberate and intentional disobedience of Judgment/ order dated 10.08.2023 passed by this Hon’ble Court in W.P.(C) 10545 of 2023 titled ‘Kusum Devi vs The Collector/ District Magistrate & Ors’ and after giving opportunity of being heard to the respondent/contemnor, he may be punished in accordance with law.”

¶12

Vide order dated 10.08.2023 in W.P.(C) 10545/2023, following directions were passed:-

¶13

"3.0 Learned counsel representing the respondents no. 1 and 3 submits that the claim of the petitioner shall lie before District Magistrate, North. Whereas the petitioner has been approaching District Magistrate, North West and even made District Magistrate,

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2025 at 14:23:53

¶16

North West as a party instead of District Magistrate, North.

¶17

4.0 Government of NCT of Delhi, the respondent no. 3 (though mentioned as the respondent no. 2) is empowered to direct the concerned District Magistrate to ensure recovery of making payment of gratuity as awarded to the petitioner herein by the controlling authority vide order dated 04.04.2022.

¶18

5.0 It is ordered accordingly.

¶19

6.0 The petition is disposed of with the directions to the Government of NCT of Delhi/respondent no. 3 (wrongly mentioned as the respondent no. 2) to ensure the payment of the awarded amount of gratuity, to the petitioner."

¶20

Vide order dated 09.04.2025, learned Predecessor Bench of this Court had passed the following directions:-

¶21

“1. Counsel for GNCTD states, on instructions, that the process of recovery is being initiated against M/s. Bonne Care Pvt. Ltd for recovery of the gratuity amount awarded by the Controlling Authority by order dated 4th April 2022 under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

¶22

Considering that quite some time has elapsed since said order was passed and petitioner has not been able to get the benefit of the same, action be taken positively, by the relevant authorities, within next 4 weeks.

¶23

In the event compliance is not done prior to the next date, relevant officer of GNCTD shall appear, either physically or through VC, to explain the reason for non-compliance.”

¶24

Status report dated 31.07.2025 authored by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Model Town, Delhi, District North, has been placed on record wherein, it has been stated as under:-

¶25

“With reference to the order dated 09/04,/2025 passed by the Hon'ble High Court, Delhi wherein it has been directed that petitioner has not been able to get the benefit of the gratuity amount

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2025 at 14:23:53

¶28

awarded by the Controlling Authority by order dated 4%, April, 2022 under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, action be taken positively, by the relevant authorities, within next 4 weeks as per the said order. In the event compliance is not done prior to the next date, relevant officer of GNCTD shall appear, either physically or through VC, to explain the reason for non-compliance.

¶29

In this regard, it is submitted that M/s. Bonne Care Pvt. Ltd. has submitted 06 post dated cheques in favour of Smt. Kusum Devi The details of the 06 post dated cheques are mentioned below:-

¶30

It is submitted that the total demand of Rs. 3,30,919/- (Rupees Three Lakh Thirty Thousand Nine Hundred Nineteen Only) + Int. @10% w.e.f. 27/11/2020 to November- 2025 recovered i.e. Rs. 4,95,920/- (Rupees Four Lakh Ninety Five Thousand Nine Hundred and Twenty Only) as recovery of the gratuity amount which was due from M/s Bonne Care Pvt. Ltd. above mentioned 06 post dated cheques (in original) are of Deputy Labour Commissioner (North-West), Labour deposited in the office Phase1V, Delhi-110054 for necessary action at Department, Nimri Colony, Ashok Vihar, their end (copy enclosed for kind perusal) .”

¶31

Since the gratuity amount has already been deposited by M/s Bonne Care Pvt. Ltd., the present petition stands disposed of.

¶32

Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of accordingly.

¶33

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶34

OCTOBER 6, 2025/ nk

¶35

This is a digitally signed order.

¶36

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2025 at 14:23:53

Kusum Devi v. Sh. Naresh Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kusum Devi v. Sh. Naresh Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hope Hall Foundation School through Its Principal Vs Central Board of Secondary Education through Its Deputy Secretary

Krishan Kumar Batra Vs Mahesh Tulsiani, Director Tulsiani Construction & Developers Ltd.

Vijay Kumar Jhamb Vs Union of India

Asics Corporation Vs Sumit Garg Proprietor of Khelmart Enterprises

Usha Sachdeva through Poa Holder Amit Sachdeva Vs Shri Subhasish Panda IAS Vice Chairman & Anr.

Gautam Gupta Vs Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Gunjan Nayyar Vs Paras Nayyar & Anr.

Sikandar Vs Ashwani Kumar (Commissioner) & Ors.

Smt Sharda Vs Union of India and Anr.

M/S Roshan Di Kulfi Vs Barinder Saw

Vijay Kumar Jhamb Vs Union of India

Ashish Vs Shri Harsh Vardhan Secretary Inland Waterways Authority of India

Oriental Foundry Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India through Mr Amit Kumar Director Railway Stores W Ministry of Railways

Neelam Tanwar Vs Pinky