Dismissed¶28

Oriental Foundry Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India through Mr Amit Kumar Director Railway Stores W Ministry of Railways

Delhi HC6 Oct 2025CONT.CAS(C)/1490/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Oriental Foundry Pvt Ltd; Union of India Ministry of Railways; contempt of courts; Section 2(b) Sections 11/12 Contempt of Courts Act 1971; CONT.CAS(C) 1490/2025; CM APPL. 62664/2025 Stay; WP(C) 14630/2025 order dated 22.09.2025; Amendment Letter No. VII dated 26.09.2025; petition withdrawn; dismissed as withdrawn; Amit Sharma J; Delhi High Court 06.10.2025; Railway Stores Director Amit Kumar; counsel R. Sudhinder, Ashish Mukhi, Sanidhya S, Kanishk Pandey; SPC Ritu Reniwal.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief decided; leave to withdraw the petition was granted and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. ¶28

Oriental Foundry Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India through Mr Amit… — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~91

¶2

IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 1490/2025&CM APPL. 62664/2025 (Stay)

¶4

ORIENTAL FOUNDRY PVT LTD .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. R. Sudhinder, Mr. Ashish Mukhi, Mr. Sanidhya S & Mr. Kanishk

¶6

Pandey, Advs.

¶7

versus

¶8

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH MR AMIT KUMAR DIRECTOR RAILWAY STORES W MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS

¶9

.....Respondent

¶10

Through: Ms. Ritu Reniwal, SPC (through VC).

¶11

CORAM:

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

% 06.10.2025

¶15

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶16

The present petition under Section 2(b) read with Sections 11/12 of the

¶17

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeks the following prayers: -

¶18

“a. Allow the present contempt petition and set aside the Amendment Letter No. VII dated 26.09.2025 issued by the Respondent;

¶19

b. Issue notice of Contempt of Courts against the Respondent; c. Initiate proceedings for contempt of the Hon’ble Court against the Contemner for its willful disobedience and prosecute them in accordance with Law;

¶20

d. Punish the Respondent in accordance to the law for their wilful disobedience of Order dated 22.09.2025 passed by this Hon’ble Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 14630 of 2025;

¶21

e. Direct the Respondent to forthwith comply with the directions contained in the Order dated 22.09.2025 passed by this Hon’ble Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 14630 of 2025; and

¶22

f. Pass such other and further orders as this Hon’ble Court may

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2025 at 14:24:04

¶25

deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case.”

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition.

¶27

Leave granted.

¶28

The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.

¶29

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶30

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶31

OCTOBER 6, 2025/ nk

¶32

This is a digitally signed order.

¶33

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2025 at 14:24:04

Oriental Foundry Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India through Mr Amit Kumar Director Railway Stores W Ministry of Railways

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Oriental Foundry Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India through Mr Amit Kumar Director Railway Stores W Ministry of Railways

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hope Hall Foundation School through Its Principal Vs Central Board of Secondary Education through Its Deputy Secretary

Krishan Kumar Batra Vs Mahesh Tulsiani, Director Tulsiani Construction & Developers Ltd.

Vijay Kumar Jhamb Vs Union of India

Asics Corporation Vs Sumit Garg Proprietor of Khelmart Enterprises

Usha Sachdeva through Poa Holder Amit Sachdeva Vs Shri Subhasish Panda IAS Vice Chairman & Anr.

Gautam Gupta Vs Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Gunjan Nayyar Vs Paras Nayyar & Anr.

Sikandar Vs Ashwani Kumar (Commissioner) & Ors.

Smt Sharda Vs Union of India and Anr.

M/S Roshan Di Kulfi Vs Barinder Saw

Vijay Kumar Jhamb Vs Union of India

Kusum Devi Vs Sh. Naresh Kumar

Ashish Vs Shri Harsh Vardhan Secretary Inland Waterways Authority of India

Neelam Tanwar Vs Pinky