Nand Ram v. Shri Ashwani Kumar IAS & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition listed for hearing; petitioner's counsel sought adjournment as arguing counsel was unavailable. The court re-notified the matter, including the application for recalling of orders, to a later date. No substantive orders were passed.
What the court decided
$~1
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CONT.CAS(C) 869/2025
NAND RAM .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Radhika Chandrasekhar, and Ms. Parul Sharma, Advocates
versus
SHRI ASHWANI KUMAR IAS & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Siddhant Nath, Standing Counsel for MCD with Ms. B. Makhija and Mr. Amaan Khan, Advocates for MCD Mr. Sanjeev Anand, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Renu Kuhar and Ms. Anshi Srivastava, Advocates for R-2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R
% 08.04.2026
- This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nand Ram
- respondent
Shri Ashwani Kumar IAS
- respondent
Anr.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court